Sunday, October 25, 2020

Judith of France (844 - unkown), Our 35th Great-grandmother: A Love Story

 

Baldwin I of Flanders and his wife, Judith of France, by Jan van der Asselt, ca. 1372/73, but probably heavily restored in the 19th century.

Who does not enjoy a love story, especially when it involves one's ancestors. In a previous blog, I wrote of our 35th great-grandfather, Alfred the Great, and his youngest daughter, Ælfthryth of Wessex (877- 929), who married Baldwin II (865-918), Margrave of Flanders, and they became our 34th great-grandparents. Baldwin's parents were Baldwin, first margrave of Flanders and Judith of France, a woman with a mind of her own.

Charles the Bald as depicted in 845 in his personal Bible
 

Born about 844, Judith was the eldest daughter of Charles the Bald (823-877), king of West Francia HERE, and Ermentrude of Orléans, our 36th great-grandparents. Her great-grandfather was Charlemagne, our 38th great-grandfather HERE.Royal Carolingian princesses seldom married, but were sent into nunneries to avoid entangling alliances. If they did marry, it never was to a foreigner, but times they were a-changing. The encroachments by the Danes got into Charles the Bald's head, for when Judith was twelve, the 55-year-old elderly King Æthelwulf of Wessex negotiated for her hand in Paris while on a pilgrimage to Rome, accompanied by his youngest son, the future King Alfred the Great, and married her on his way back. 

All the lands Charlemagne conquered. West Francia with capital Paris on left.


After the wedding ceremony in October 856, little Judith was anointed with myrrh by the archbishop of Rheims and declared Queen of Wessex - something unheard of, as previous wives of Wessex kings were not called 'queen', but only wives. This honor was insisted upon by her father, perhaps to secure her position in Wessex, a wild and crazy place, because King Æthelwulf's eldest son, Æthelbald, had risen against him during his absence, but settled for half of Wessex. Or, he rose up after Judith arrived in Wessex, fearing any son she would have would take precedence over his claim to the throne.

A King Æthelwulf penny. Was this a good likeness of our ancestor?
 

Judith settled into royal life in Wessex, but King Æthelwulf HERE died in January 858. We are descended from this 36th great-grandfather only through King Alfred because Judith had no children by him. 

  

After Æthelwulf's death, Judith, now 14 or 15 years old, married that eldest son, Æthelbald, chosen by the witan (council) as king of Wessex. It saved her from being sent to a nunnery. Marrying one's stepmother was beyond the pale, not even the pagan Danes committed such an offense, but marrying into the Carolingian dynasty enhanced Æthelbald's position. Judith was still a queen, the signing of numerous charters proving her status. Two and a half years later, in 860, Æthelbald died. Judith was still childless at age seventeen.

She sold her property in Wessex and returned to Francia, where her father placed her in the monastery of Senlis in modern northern France, under royal protection, with all the honors due a queen until such time as she was suitably remarried to a noble of his choice.

The Meeting of Baldwin and Judith. Wood panel at the seminary in Bruges, Belgium. I doubt he would have worn armor on a visit to a monastery, or she a crown, but we get the symbolism.
 

It was at Senlis that same year of 860 that she met Baldwin, perhaps already a count in Flanders, allegedly the son of a forester named Odoacre, but a man with some status, else how would he have been allowed in her presence. Foresters were often knights and minor nobles given control over royal forest lands. These two fell in love and, with the consent of her older brother, Louis the Stammerer, they likely married at the monastery in 861/862 before fleeing. Louis may have sent troops with them for his sister's protection, or Baldwin may have had his own following.

Judith's father, Charles the Bald, was enraged. He imprisoned her brother Louis in the Abbey of St. Martin and sent out troops to search for the couple. He had Baldwin excommunicated for kidnapping Judith and marrying her without royal consent.

In 862 Charles the Bald held a council with the bishops and nobles of his kingdom. According to contemporary chronicles he asked the bishops to pass a canonical verdict on Baldwin and Judith, according to the decrees of Pope Gregory II: “if anyone marries, having kidnapped a widow, let him be anathematized himself, as well as those who contributed to this.”  Charles was not an ancestor in whose company we would have been comfortable. 

Present-day Frisia in northern part of modern Netherlands

Baldwin and Judith initially sought refuge with the Viking Rorik, ruler of Frisia. Rorik was no friend to Judith's family, having  already fought against Charles the Bald on the side of Charles' brother, Lothair I. After Lothair and Charles concluded the Treaty of Verdun in 843, Lothair imprisoned Rorik, accusing him of treason. Rorik escaped and began attacking Lothair's Middle Francia kingdom, . Unable to cope with the Vikings, Lothair gave him Frisia on condition he protect the Carolingians from the rest of the Danes.

 Judith and Baldwin left Rorik because this Dane, recently converted to Christianity, was ordered by Charles' bishops not to give refuge to the king's enemies, and threatened, not with an invading army, but with the same spiritual doom Baldwin had received.  Judith and Baldwin fled for protection to the court of her cousin, Lothair II of Lotharingia (Middle Francia) at his capital of Aix-La-Chapelle, present-day Aachen, in western Germany.


  From there they traveled to Rome to plead their case to Pope Nicholas I.  The Pope listened to their arguments and sent two bishops as his legates to Charles the Bald, asking that he recognize the marriage and bring the couple into his royal circle. Still angry, Charles rejected a rapprochement. In a letter dated 23 November 862, the Pope expressed to the king his fears that Baldwin, after his excommunication from the church, might joined forces with the 'Jute prince Rorik'. This missive indicates to me that Baldwin had status and a following.

When this message reached Charles in his capital of Paris, he reluctantly forgave them, and the couple returned to France and were officially married at Auxerre on 13 December 863. Charles gave Baldwin the March of Flanders (the borderland), perhaps hoping he'd be killed in a Viking raid. 

10th century Flanders at the top encroached from Normans from the south and Vikings from the north


Baldwin quelled the Viking threat (earning the nickname of 'Iron' [Ferreum] from his contemporaries, which later generations replaced with the nickname "Iron Hand"), expanded his army and his territory quickly, and became a faithful supporter of Charles the Bald. His County of Flanders became a powerful domain in France. He and Judith lived on an island at the confluence of the Boterbeke and Roya rivers that became modern Bruges, Belgium.

Baldwin I died in 879 in the city of Arras (in present-day France on the Belgian border) and was buried in the Abbey of Saint-Bertin near Saint-Omer.  His and Judith's son became Baldwin II (born c.865/867 – c. 918). We don't know exactly when Judith died. It's possible it was she who arranged the marriage of her son Baldwin II to Alfred the Great's youngest daughter Ælfthryth of Wessex (877- 929), between 893 and 899. They became our 34th great-grandparents.

Baldwin and Judith

 

 

 

 

 


 


Saturday, October 17, 2020

Ælfthryth of Wessex, Daughter of Saxon King Alfred the Great, Our 34th Great-Grandmother

King Alfred the Great
 

Jay and I are watching a four-season series streaming on Netflix, titled "The Last Kingdom," based on Bernard Cornwell's historical novels, The Saxon Chronicles, about King Alfred the Great's conflicts with invading Danes as he establishes an England out of his kingdom of Wessex and neighboring Mercia.  It's a very good series, but does compress events. The protagonist, Uhtred of Northumbria, a Saxon reared by Danes, actually lived later; he's quite the flawed hero. We always turn on the subtitles to understand all the dialogue (just a suggestion, in case you decide to give the series a try). 


I'm newly interested in early medieval England because I've discovered we're descended from King Alfred the Great (848-899) and his wife, Ealhswith/Ealswitha (died 902) a noble lady of Mercia, believed descended from tribal Britions - our 35th great-grandparents. I kid you not. It's not uncommon to be descended from Alfred. His son King Edward the Elder had about 14 children by three wives. However, it's not through Edward we're descended. You can read about Alfred HERE


Alfred's
youngest of three daughters, Ælfthryth of Wessex (877- 929), also known as Elftrudis/Elftrude/Elfrida), became the wife of Baldwin II (865-918), Margrave of Flanders, married between 893 and 897. They were our 34th great-grandparents. The Anglo-Flemish alliance was intended to assist Baldwin in clearing the Danes from what became northern France, a stepping stone into Europe that England needed. Baldwin was rather blood-thirsty, but it must have been the times. They were buried in Ghent in present-day Belgium. Baldwin's bio HERE
10th century Flanders/Flandre across the Channel from England

Their son, Arnulf I (c. 893/899-964), First Count of Flanders, styled "The Great," married Adele of Vermandois (c 915–960), a Frankish noblewoman, who was both a Carolingian (Frankish royal family, whose direct ancestor [and ours] was Charlemagne, son of Pepin the Short, son of Charles Martel, our 40th great-grandfather and founder of the dynasty - but, that's for a future blog) as well as a Robertian (from the Capetian dynasty, founded by Hugh Capet). Arnulf's rule ended when he was murdered. HERE

Their youngest child, Elstrude/Elftrude/Elisende (937-970), married Sigfrid/Siegfried the Dane (920 Denmark - 965), comte (Count) de Guînes, which is in present-day northern France at the Belgian border. The Danes had taken this land in 928. (George Washington was also a descendant, so why shouldn't we be. Our families lived in Virginia at the same time.) Arnulf, Count of Flanders, realizing a counter-attack against the Danes would be costly, arranged the marriage of his daughter Elstrude to Sigfrid, the Danish leader, bestowing upon him the title of Count of Guînes, but as vassal to him, the Count of Flanders. Under Sigfrid’s successors, the county of Guînes acquired considerable importance. 

Guînes in present-day France. Note its closeness to Calais, where the English always landed when they invaded France. You can see on this map Bruges, Belgium, in what was Flanders.

Their son, born after his father's death, was Ardolph (966-996), 2nd comte de Guînes, almost from birth provided the title of Count of Guînes by Arnulf II, Count of Flanders, his cousin, who brought him up in his court. Arnulf II also gave him the land of Brédenarde. Ardolph married Matilda/Mahaut de Boulogne, daughter of Ernicule, Count of Boulogne. They were our 31st great-grandparents. 

Present-day Boulogne, France

Their son was Rodolphe/Rodelphus, le Blund, 3rd comte de Guînes, born 982 in Guînes and died 1036 in Paris, who married Rosella de Saint Pol (c 995-1062).  I know you're thinking, "How are these ancestors, living in what is present-day France, connected to that line of English ancestors you've been blogging about?" Well, I'll tell you.

Remains of moat and bailey at Guînes where our ancestors were born and lived.

Rodolphe's and Rosella's second son was Robert le Blund/Blount (c1033 Guînes - died after 1086 Suffolk, England), who married Gundred Ferrers (c1040 Normandy - died after 1086 Suffolk, England). Robert joined William the Conqueror HERE on his invasion of England in 1066 and, as a result, was given 14 manors in County Suffolk and was styled 1st Baron, Lord of Ixworth.

County Suffolk, England. Ixworth is in its western part.
 

Robert and Gundred were buried  6 miles from Ixworth at Bury St. Edmunds, Suffolk. They were our 29th great-grandparents. The Conqueror's wife, Matilda of Flanders, was a distant cousin of Robert le Blund, both being descended from Arnulf, Count of Flanders. Remember him? And that made Matilda HERE also descended from Alfred the Great. The right woman to make queen if you'd just conquered England.

Scene from Battle of Hastings in Bayeux Tapestry. Read about its creation in the 1080s HERE

You will recall my most recent blog about Richard de Argentein, the Crusader. It was his wife, Cassandra de Insula (1180-1227), our 24th great-grandmother, who was descended from Robert le Blund.

These ancestors combined Briton, Saxon, Danish, Flemish, Frankish and who knows what other ethnicities to make Englishmen and women. No wonder our DNA has a large section that is called only "northern Europe."

 

 

 


 

Tuesday, October 13, 2020

Taking the Cross: Our 24th Great-grandfather, Richard de Argentein, and the Crusades

Coat of Arms of Argentein family

It was difficult to trace the Rainey family from our 3rd great-grandfather James (b.1814 Pulaski Co., KY) back over the Appalachians to Tidewater Virginia, because few records survived the Civil War. But then our DNA matches with his wife's family convinced me that William Rainey (b.1750 Surry Co., VA) was our 5th great-grandfather.  I have been researching the ancestry of William's mother, Mary Jackson (b.1724 Brunswick Co., VA), back past our 9th great-grandfather, William Clopton, the Immigrant (b.1655 County Essex, England), and his pedigree has proved too fascinating to ignore.

In my previous blog I gave our ascent to our 19th great-grandfather, Sir Nigel Loring, and wrote of his role in the Hundred Years' War. Now I'll take you back further. Sir Nigel's mother was Cassandra Perot/Pyrot (c.1300-1349), daughter of Reginald Perot/Pyrot (c1268-1325), whose mother was our 22nd great-grandmother, Cassandra de Argentein, born about 1240 at Great Wymondley, County Hertfordshire. Her father, Sir Giles de Argentein (c1210-1282), was the son of our subject, our 24th great-grandfather,  Sir Richard de Argentein (c1180-1246), who went, not on one, but on two crusades, and rubbed shoulders with Saint Francis of Assisi in Egypt. I so enjoy finding our ancestors having encounters with unexpected historical figures. 

Sir Richard's forebear, our 28th great-grandfather, David de Argentein (born c1045 Argentan, Orne, Basse-Normandie, France), appears in the Domesday Book of 1086, so he likely came to England from Normandy with William the Conqueror in 1066, but held only small estates, so might not have fought at the Battle of Hastings. 

David's son, Reginald, was granted the manor of Great Wymondley, in Hertfordshire, by King William [I or II]. The land was held 'by serjeanty', namely, by acting as a cupbearer at the king's coronation. The Argenteins and their descendants continued to perform this service for more than 600 years and, as a result, they bore arms showing three silver covered cups on a red field.

County Hertfordshire, England

 It appears that during the anarchy of King Stephen's reign
(1135-1154), Reginald's son John erected a stronghold of the 'motte and bailey' type, whose remains lie to the east of the churchyard in Great Wymondley.
Moat and bailey type castle for defense


Site of remains of the Argentein family's 12th century moat and bailey stronghold

 It was this John's grandson, another Reginald de Argentein, who improved the family's fortunes, serving as sheriff in Cambridgeshire and Huntingdonshire in 1193, 1194 and 1195, and in Essex and Hertfordshire in 1197 (for half a year). More significantly, he was appointed a justice, and sat both at Westminster and in the provinces. With power comes wealth, but also the royal gaze. He died about 1203 during the reign of King John.

His son, Richard, began his long and successful life by marrying a Bedfordshire heiress, Emma, who died after producing a daughter. He married about 1204 his second wife, our ancestress Cassandra, daughter of Robert de Insula (or de Lisle), who brought into her marriage lands in County Suffolk.

County Suffolk, England

King John, forced by the barons to sign the Magna Carta in 1215, died in 1216, and his nine-year-old son was crowned Henry III (1207-1272). Richard served this king for the rest of his knightly life. And what a life.

The crowned child king, Henry III
 

Between 1216 and 1218, Richard founded the priory of Little Wymondley, a house of Austin Canons, and endowed it with property in Wymondley and elsewhere, including the church of St. Mary the Virgin of Little Wymondley.

Norman church, St. Mary the Virgin, Little Wymondley
 

Richard took the cross and joined the 5th Crusade of 1218, expecting to be a knight of the army that would retake Jerusalem from the Muslims by first conquering Egypt, then traveling overland across Gaza.

Richard's armor and especially his helmet may have resembled this 13th century look.
 

During the siege of the port of Damietta, Egypt, a deadly battle was fought in late August 1219.  A few weeks later the future Saint Francis of Assisi crossed the battle lines to preach to the Sultan in an attempt to convert him, staying among the Muslims three days. The Sultan remained indifferent. Richard may have seen Francis, who already had some renown, but since the friar preached in Italian, he likely paid little attention. 

"Capture of Damietta" by Dutch painter Cornelis Claesz van Wieringen (early 17th century)
 

In November 1219 the Crusaders succeeded in capturing Damietta.  A letter Richard wrote from the occupied city in 1220 to his kinsman, the abbot of Bury St. Edmunds, gives a glimpse into medieval religious attitudes, which seem rather familiar to this Catholic-reared writer. After its capture, the Crusaders were quick to convert Damietta's mosques into churches. Richard founded a handsomely adorned church, dedicated to the martyred king of East Anglia, St. Edmund, his patron saint (and that of England until Edward III replaced him with St. George), and established there three chaplains with clerks (educated priests). He had a painted wooden statue of the saint erected inside (often depicted bound and shot with Danish arrows), which attracted the hostile attention of a Flemish servant. As the Fleming left, hurling abuse at the martyred saint, a beam of wood fell on his head, hurting him badly. It was a miracle, Richard triumphantly related to the abbot. The siege of Damietta HERE

The Crusaders did not reach Jerusalem, and Richard returned to England by 1224, when Henry III, no doubt impressed by his crusading zeal, made him sheriff of Cambridgeshire and Huntingdonshire, and also of Hertfordshire and Essex. At the same time he was made constable of Hertford Castle, an office he held until August 1228. He was in military action again at the siege of Bedford Castle in the summer of 1224, in support of Henry III against the rebellious baron, Falkes de Bréau. HERE The siege lasted for eight weeks, and those outside the castle suffered heavy casualties. Richard himself was severely wounded, possibly by an arrow, 'in the stomach below the navel', despite being in armor. He survived and about this time founded the hospital of St. John and St. James in  Royston, Hertfordshire.

Bedford Castle and the execution of its garrison of 80 knights and Falk's brother William in 1224, (Matthew of Paris)

Richard continued in royal favor. In February 1225 he was among the witnesses of Henry III's Great Charter (issued under pressure from the barons). He witnessed another royal charter at Windsor in June 1226. Then, as one of two royal stewards, between January and November 1227, he witnessed a string of charters. His star was fast rising, and he was given permission to build a chapel in his manor at Melbourn, Cambridgeshire, and to keep a chaplain there. Quite an honor.

County Cambridgeshire
 

In April 1230 the king took Richard's lands under his protection, having sent Richard overseas in the king's service, accompanied by Giles de Wachesham, whose family were tenants of the Argenteins in Huntingdonshire. In September that year, Richard's son, Giles de Argentein (our 23rd great-grandfather) was also overseas in the king's service. The Argenteins' journeys presumably were connected with the military expedition which Henry undertook that summer in a failed attempt to regain French lands lost by his father, King John.

Henry III leading his army to France in 1330 (Matthew of Paris)
 

In 1331 Richard's heir, Giles (our 23rd great-grandfather), age about 21, and a younger son were captured by the Welsh in an expedition against Prince Llewellyn, and were ransomed.

About this time Richard lost the king's favor when the noble under whose patronage Richard had achieved so much, Hubert de Burgh, Earl of Kent, fell from the king's grace.HERE  Richard lost two manors the king had earlier granted him. Although he never regained those manors, by May 1234 he was back in royal favor, traveling with the king and witnessing a number of royal charters.

He made his son Giles his attorney in 1336 to handle his affairs. We know this because Giles had to defend against a suit brought by Richard's Jewish creditors, who were called to Westminster to give evidence regarding Richard's debts. A portion of any monies awarded to Jewish lenders was claimed by Henry III, who was already heavily taxing the Jews in order to fight his wars. They were the only group allowed to lend money, since popes had banned usury. A brief history of the Jews in England until their expulsion in 1290 HERE  

Richard settled some manors on son Giles and went off on the Barons' Crusade, probably in the summer of 1240, serving under Richard of Cornwall, brother of King Henry.  Although Cornwall departed Jerusalem for England in 1241, Richard de Argentein, in his sixties, remained. He is listed on Wikipedia as a Knight Templar from 1241 until his death in 1246. History of Knights Templar HERE

Knights Templar c.1240

According to the Dunstable Chronicle (written by monks who collected tales from travelers), when the Turks entered Jerusalem in July 1244, only Richard de Argentein with 20 knights in the Tower of David (the citadel) held out. On 23 August, under the influence of An-Nasir of Kerak, a Muslim ally of the Crusaders, the defenders were allowed to leave the city under a flag of truce, after which its Christian residents allegedly were massacred by the Khwarazmians, originally from northern Syria, and the city was destroyed. Richard may have been the last Crusader banished from Jerusalem. A short history of the Barons' Crusade HERE

Richard returned home the following year, 1245, and died in 1246. Matthew of Paris, the chronicler and artist, records his death among those of 'certain nobles in England', describing him as a 'an energetic knight who in the Holy Land had fought faithfully for God for a long time'. 

And now to Richard's son, Sir Giles de Argentein (1210-1282), our 23rd great-grandfather. After being captured in Wales and fighting in France, in 1236 he married Margery Aguillon (1215–1267). 

In June 1242, while his father, Richard, was in Jerusalem, Giles was summoned by Henry III to fight in Poitou, France, in another failed attempt to regain lands lost to the French.

After his father's death, Giles became Justiciar of Normandy (a sort of prime minister) in 1247. His rise and subsequent fall from royal favor is complicated, involving the king's brother-in-law, Simon de Montfort, Earl of Leicester HERE, and the 2nd Baron's War. Below is Giles' biography found online in Outline of the history of the Argentein family: 11th to 13th centuries:

We first hear of Giles holding high office when, in May 1258, Henry III agreed to the establishment of a council of 24 to reform the realm. Giles was one of the 12 members of the committee nominated by the barons, and was also a member of another committee of 24 appointed to negotiate an aid for the king [citation omitted].

Soon afterwards, Giles de Argentein was appointed - as his father Richard had been - a royal steward. In this capacity his name appears in many documents between September 1258 and February 1260 [citation omitted]. The end of this period coincides with an open break with the reform movement, made by the king when he forbade the holding of a Parliament at Candlemas. Later in 1260, de Montfort enjoyed a temporary restoration to influence, and again we find Giles holding office. In November, he was appointed a member of two commissions to look into local difficulties at Dunwich and Cambridge [citation omitted]. and in December he was appointed a justice itinerant - as his grandfather Reginald had been - for the Midland counties [citation omitted].

In the following year, Henry III again asserted his authority against the barons, and we hear no more of Giles's official career until the Summer of 1263, when de Montfort gained control of south-eastern England. In August, Giles was made constable of Windsor [citation omitted], from which foreign mercenaries under the king's son, Prince Edward, had just been expelled. The barons' success was short-lived: on 16 October, Prince Edward seized Windsor Castle, and de Montfort's administration crumbled. (The following month, the Patent Roll [written royal record from which researchers retrieve all this information] euphemistically refers to Giles de Argentein's 'withdrawal' from the constableship.)

Open war broke out the following Spring between the royalists and the barons. Giles de Argentein was among those to whom Henry III on 11 May addressed a final appeal to return to fealty [citation omitted]. The appeal failed, and on 14 May at Lewes HERE, Simon de Montfort comprehensively defeated the royalists, and effectively captured the king and his son, Prince Edward. We do not know if Giles was personally present at the battle, but he immediately benefited from the outcome. In June he was made Guardian of the Peace for Cambridgeshire [citation omitted] and, more importantly, he was appointed one of the Council of Nine by which the country was to be governed [citation omitted].

Prince Edward at Battle of Lewes

In the following months he remained with the captive king, as copious documentary evidence shows. We can trace the progress of de Montfort's party into the Welsh Marches, as their fortunes worsened, and to Hereford, where Prince Edward escaped from their custody on 28 May [citation omitted]. Finally Simon de Montfort and his supporters were trapped by the royalists at Evesham, and annihilated there on 4 August 1265.HERE Giles de Argentein is known to have fought at Evesham [citation omitted], and one contemporary source even includes him in the list of the leading Montfortians who were killed there [citation omitted]. Although he was not killed, the king's victory was - temporarily - disastrous for him and his family.

Death of Simon de Montfort at Battle of Eversham

As a defeated rebel, Giles de Argentein immediately suffered the seizure of all his lands. In the Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous are details of eleven of the estates which were confiscated - at Weston, Wymondley, Lilley and Willian in Hertfordshire, Flitcham and Wilton in Norfolk, Halesworth, Newmarket and Burton in Suffolk, Bumpstead in Essex and Pidley in Huntingdonshire. In addition, the manor of Melbourn had been seized by the royalist Warin de Bassingburn [citation omitted].

Few of the confiscated estates were lost permanently [although he had to pay heavy fines to retrieve them], except in cases where Giles had abused his influence during the period when the barons controlled the country. When Robert de Stuteville had been captured and imprisoned by Henry de Montfort, he had been forced to sell Giles the manor of Withersfield in Suffolk. This manor was now restored to its former owner [citation omitted]. Giles also seems to have taken the opportunity to seize the manors of Lilley and Willian in Hertfordshire, of which his father had been deprived in 1232, and which the family had tried unsuccessfully to recover through the courts [citation omitted].

Giles received the king's pardon in February 1266 [citation omitted] and subsequently recovered his principal estates at Wymondley, Halesworth, Melbourn and Newmarket [citation omitted]. Unsurprisingly - for he would now have been an elderly man - we hear little more of Giles, although he survived for another 16 years, dying shortly before 24 November 1282, when the sheriff of Hertford was notified of his death [citation omitted.]

 It was his daughter Cassandra (born c. 1240), who became our 22nd great-grandmother after marrying Sir Ralph Perot/Pyrot.

A footnote about Sir Ralph Perot/Pyrot. In 1277 he claimed the right to present a leper to the hospital of St. Julian at St. Michael in Hertfordshire and, on the death of one, to present another. The agreement was witnessed in 1281 at Westminster in London. Leprosy was a terrible bacterial disease - thank goodness for the invention of antibiotics.

 


 

 




 

 

Friday, October 2, 2020

Our 19th Great-grandfather: Sir Nigel Loring KG (c1320-1386) and the Black Prince

 Sir Neel/Nigel Loring, KG (c1320-1386), wearing his garter robes over a tunic showing his arms. From the 1430 Bruges Garter Book made by William Bruges (1375–1450). Sir Nigel was likely bearded with long hair, but when the illustration was made the style was clean-shaven.
 

I once said to my book group, "We Americans are all descended from peasants." A member countered that she was descended from a noble family of Luxembourg. "All right," I conceded, "but the rest of your ancestors were probably peasants." She agreed that might be so. I believed this until, with a better understanding of 17th century immigration to Virginia and Maryland - those younger sons of aristocratic families fallen on hard times, seeking to make tobacco fortunes in the New World - I discovered that some individuals in our pedigree appear in recorded history.

In my previous blog I gave the lineage from William Rainey, our 6th great-grandfather, up to our 13th great-grandparents, Joan Acworth and Edward Waldegrave and their travails in Tudor times.  HERE

King Edward III's tomb, likely how he appeared in life.


Generations earlier, during the reign of King Edward III (1312-1377), our ancestor, Sir Nigel Loring (c1320-1386), was famous in his lifetime as a courageous soldier during the Hundred Years War, loyal bodyguard in battle and household chamberlain in peace to the king's son, Edward, Prince of Wales, later called the Black Prince. I'm grateful to our very distant English cousin, Sue Valiant, who shares Joan Acworth's father, George Acworth (1478-1530), as our common ancestor (as well as Sir Nigel). She's permitted me to quote from her 50 page biography, titled  Sir Nigel Loring, His Life and Times, that she posted on Ancestry. Her passages are in italics.

The lineage beyond George Acworth (1478-1530), our 14th great-grandfather, is through George's mother, Elizabeth Broughton (c1450 - c1515), her father Sir John Broughton (c1407 - c1489), his mother, Mary Pever (c1375 - c1409), and her mother, Margaret Loring (c1355 - c1424). Margaret and her older sister Isabel were Sir Nigel Loring's surviving children and his heirs. The Loring family had been in possession of the Manor of Chalgrave, Bedfordshire, since Albert of Lorraine became court chaplain to William the Conqueror and appeared in the Domesday Book of 1086 in possession of Chalgrave and nearby lands. Apparently, Albert, a Norman, had been chaplain to Edward the Confessor, son of Emma of Normandy, during his kingship, and simply passed his allegiance to his kinsman, William,  upon the defeat of Harold at Hastings. Priests could marry until the Church forbade it in 1139.

County Bedfordshire, England
  

Sir Nigel (sometime Neel) Loring (c1320-1386) is our 19th great-grandfather.  Hard to wrap your mind around this, I know. He spoke Anglo-Norman, French, and probably a soldier's English. 

In the 14th century people lived closer to heaven than to earth, faith was strong, life difficult, eyes ever lifted Godward. Wars were blessed as righteous. Civilians, men, women and children, might be hacked to death after a French town fell to warn towns farther on not to resist the might of King Edward of England, but such slaughter was not a sin. Chivalry was not what we imagine. In wartime human life had no value except for ransom to fill the coffers of the king and to enrich his armies as he fought for the throne of France, claimed through his mother Isabelle. Sir Nigel Loring believed with a simple and steadfast heart that his military prowess in the name of King Edward and Prince Edward was righteous and godly. He became one of the great knights of the realm. The 14th century has been called a 'distant mirror' of our own times. You decide.

The years of Nigel’s early life would have been difficult for his father, [Sir] Roger, as this was when Roger Mortimer and Queen Isabella overthrew Edward II and took power for themselves in the name of Isabella’s son Edward. On 21st January 1327 Edward II was forced to abdicate and Edward III became King. Roger Loring would have had to choose sides during the turbulent years at the end of the reign of Edward II. . . In October 1330 when Edward III was strong enough to turn on Mortimer, . . . Roger Loring successfully chose the winning side and was in a position to place his son Nigel Loring in the household of Edward III.

At about age eight, Nigel would have been placed in the household of another knight to learn a knight's craft. By 1335, at fifteen, he was still in training in the royal household. In 1340, his training complete, he was chosen to accompany Edward III on his Flanders campaign. A large French fleet stopped the English fleet at the mouth of the River Zwin and the Battle of Sluys ensued on 24 June.

A miniature of the Battle of Sluys from Jean Froissart's Chronicles, 15th century


The smaller English boats used grappling hooks, long bows, and hand-to-hand fighting to defeat and destroy the French fleet, ensuring future battles would occur on the continent. The king was 28 and Nigel about 20. After the battle the king knighted Nigel for bravery and granted him
£20 per year to maintain his estate of knighthood. Through the years Nigel would have difficulty receiving full payment. A king might possess wealth in lands, but gold and silver were often scarce.

The new knight had to establish himself and acquire all the equipment he needed. Knighthood was expensive. Nigel had very little money of his own at this stage so might have had to ask for parental help until the money promised by the king was paid. Armour and special horses were a basic expense. A knight used a comfortable palfrey for riding and training and only mounted his war horse (destrier) when he was about to fight. Then there was the cost of tournaments and the special armour and weapons needed for them. A knight was expected to follow an affluent lifestyle especially if he was in the household of the King or the Prince of Wales. Whilst he was in the royal household his food and lodgings might be found but when on government work attending courts and on diplomatic missions then expenses had to be paid out of the knightly pocket and reimbursed if and when possible. He would need to employ pages, squires, grooms and body servants to look after himself, his armour and his horses. His squires would also need horses, usually hackneys, and his equipment had to be carried on pack horses or on a wagon. As a knight he had the right to bear arms and the arms of Nigel Loring were Quarterly argent [silver] and gules [red] a bend engrailed [edge of concave curves] sable [black]


Sir Nigel Loring's coat of arms, likely already held by the family for a few generations.

 

A joust
 

In February, 1342, 250 helmeted knights assembled for the tournament at Dunstable near Nigel's home, a place where tournaments had been held for about two hundred years. With much pageantry, parading and preliminary jousting, the main event, the great mêlée, in which two armies attempted to unseat and capture opponents for ransom and horses, did not begin until the sun was going down, leaving little time for ransoms to be won or lost. It's believed to have been the last mêlée-tournament held in England. Nigel's grandfathers and his father Roger had participated in earlier tournament mêlées.

A tournament mêlée in 1300


Nigel fought in Brittany in 1342 when King Edward and King Philip IV of France backed rival claimants for the Duchy of Brittany.

Brittany, France
 

It was the dispute over whether Gascony belonged to the English king or to the French king that began the Hundred Years' War. In October 1344 Nigel was a member of a group of Edward III's personal friends sent to negotiate with nobles in Gascony regarding their allegiance prior to Edward's deciding whether to deploy military forces. 

Gascony, a Basque area
 

Edward III's possession of Aquitaine was also weakening and Nigel served under the command of Henry Grosmont, Earl of Derby (later  Duke of Lancaster), sent in the king's name to take command of Aquitaine.

Henry Grosmont, Earl of Derby, later Duke of Lancaster, in his Garter robes

Modern Aquitaine in France

At the age of 25 Nigel was sent on his first recorded diplomatic mission as envoy to the Papal Court at Avignon to report to the Pope about the peace negotiations in Gascony. The new pope, Clement VI, was a Frenchman who had served King Philip as Chancellor. Clement was pro French and anti English in the dispute between the two Kings.
Papal Court at Avignon

Pope Clement, aware that Edward III was preparing for war, wrote to King Edward of his irritation that the Earl of Derby had refused to come himself, but asked the king to prolong the truce for a year.


On the same day the Pope wrote to Henry, earl of Derby in Gascony. ‘The pope has heard, by Nigel de Loring, knight, that which makes him grieve the more at the non-arrival of the earl, to whom he was ready to concede whatever should make for peace.’ This shows that Nigel spoke to the Pope in person. Six days later on 26 April 1345, the Pope was writing to King Philip of France passing on secret information gleaned from the English delegation. . . .


It is interesting to note that Nigel used the occasion of his official visit to make a personal petition to the pope on behalf of his younger brother John Loring [a cleric]. ‘Nigel Loring, knight of the earl of Derby, sometime the king's ambassador to the pope. Whereas, on behalf of his brother, John Loring, of the diocese of Lincoln, a petition was made for a benefice in the gift of the abbot and convent of Ramesey, value 100l, notwithstanding that he was in his seventeenth year, which was granted for a benefice, without cure of souls, to the value of 30 marks; and as the said grant is useless, the pope is prayed to grant a dispensation to the said John to hold benefices. Granted to the amount of 50 marks with cure of souls, 30 without, Dated as above 28th July 1345.[citation omitted]

As the war began in France in 1345, Nigel contracted to fight for Henry Grosmont, Earl of Derby. In a knight's contract, called an 'indenture', was a valuation for his warhorse, with a promise of recompense should the horse be lost in battle.

A knight's most valuable possession, his destrier.
 

Over his armour every knight wore a [cloth] coat of arms with his blazon on it. This identified him when he was fully armoured and unrecognizable by friend and foe. The coat of arms allowed a knight to decide which enemy knight to fight with the object not of killing him but of taking him prisoner and ransoming him. After skirmishes and battles there was a market where prisoners were bought, sold and exchanged. Selling his prisoner gave a knight more readily available money and no problems awaiting ransoms. Indentures provided for all ransoms more than £500 to be for the king, with compensation. Soldiers had to give a third of their prize money to their captain and he had to give a third of his gains to the king. Capturing prisoners and guarding them was a problem in the heat of battle and diminished the efficiency of the fighting unit. Such was the honour among knights that once captured their captor could ask them to leave the battle and not continue to fight and come back when the battle was over to arrange their ransom. The prisoner would usually hand over some part of his arms in pledge to his captor. Lesser men were killed outright.

The strongest English weapon was the chevauchée, raiding deep into France, killing, plundering and burning towns and villages, taking wealthy prisoners for ransom, forcing towns to submit to the English king to avoid destruction, thereby putting the French king to disadvantage because neither army really wanted a destructive battle. Only Church property was respected.


Sir Nigel fought in the division of Henry Grosmont, now Earl of Lancaster, in Gascony in 1346, providing 3 esquires and a hobelar - a lightly mounted infantryman. It's believed Nigel was at the siege of Calais when the city fell on 4 August 1347, after nearly a year of assaults. Edward, Prince of Wales, was also present.

Depiction of a French town under siege
 

In September 1347 a peace treaty was agreed, planned to last until 8 July 1348. It was to cover France, Scotland and Flanders. Edward and his knights returned home to England to celebrate their military successes with tournaments, hunting and spending their prize money. The nation was ecstatic. The news of the victories was announced from the pulpits and proclaimed at the market cross. It was said that no woman in England lacked for a new gown or jewellery as so much wealth was brought back from France. The joy did not last long as the pestilence came to England.

Depiction of burial of plague victims
 

We now call it the Black Death but at the time it was referred to as ‘the pestilence’. It arrived in Southampton in August 1348. In September the plague was in Dorset and by November it had reached London. In New Year 1349 the plague swept through south England killing around 40% of the population. By March the food supply had collapsed, law and order had broken down and the economy was suffering deflation. The chronicler Henry Knighton described it. ‘And there was a great cheapness of all things for fear of death, for very few took any account of riches or of possessions of any kind. A man could have a horse which was formerly worth forty shillings for half a mark (6s 8d), a big fat ox for four shillings, a cow for twelve pence, a heifer for sixpence, a fat wether for fourpence, a sheep for threepence, a lamb for tuppence, a large pig for fivepence and a stone of wool for ninepence. Sheep and oxen strayed through the fields and among the crops, and there was no one to drive them off or to collect them, but they perished in uncounted numbers throughout all districts for lack of shepherds, because there was such a shortage of servants and labourers.[citation omitted] To add to this there was cattle pestilence and heavy rain began to fall. Sheep and cattle died and crops failed. In January 1349 the king and his court went into the country and probably because they generally lived in more hygienic and airier conditions than the normal populace none of the knights of the garter died of the plague. About 25% of their contemporaries between the ages of 21-35 died. By autumn 1349 Henry Knighton tells us ‘no one could get a reaper for less than eightpence with food, or a mower for less than twelvepence with food. For this reason many crops perished in the fields for lack of harvesters’. In 1348 a ploughman earned about 2 shillings a week. By 1350 this had risen to 10 shillings. Landowners who did not have enough cash (rents could not be paid by dead tenants) had to sell off parts of their estates cheaply in order to avoid bankruptcy. All this affected Nigel as he looked to his manor of Chalgrave and started to buy more land.  


The royal court kept away from London and Edward III ruled by decree. The country was in economic meltdown but Edward went ahead with his plans to inaugurate the Order of the Garter which he did on 23 April 1349. Nigel is well documented as one of the first Knights of the Garter. He had the 10th stall on the Prince’s side. Nigel was 28 by this time and had been knighted only 8 years and yet he was picked as one of the original 26 Garter Knights.

Sir Nigel Loring as a founding member of the Knights of the Order of the Garter

 

The actual function of the order was almost exclusively religious. It was a serious and solemn foundation. Knights of the Garter had to celebrate mass for dead knights and assist in the maintenance of the college of canons at Windsor. Every time they passed through Windsor the KG had to hear mass at the chapel. They all had to be present at the St George’s day feast to hear mass unless they were absent by the king’s leave. If they were absent they were to celebrate the feast themselves as if they were at Windsor. One of the secular rules was that no KG was to be seen in public without his garter.[ Richard Barber, Edward Prince of Wales and Aquitaine, Boydell 1978] The Garter was an order of chivalry and something should be said of what chivalry meant in the fourteenth century. Its major components were loyalty and prowess. Prowess was noted from individual achievement on the battlefield or the tournament. It was the most esteemed of the qualities of a soldier. Prowess combined skill at arms with great daring. Prowess was honoured above generalship or strategy. Command was given to the most senior noble on campaign without regard to fitness for office and strategy was not a recognised military skill of the time. To be one of the original knights, Nigel must have convinced the king of both his loyalty and prowess.

In about 1348 Nigel, now a rich man, married Margaret Beauple, daughter of Sir Ralph Beauple of Knowstone in Devon and Elizabeth Bloyou, our 20th great-grandparents. They were large landowners and Margaret brought Beaworthy as her marriage jointure; in 1371 she inherited her father's other lands. Nigel served in France with Sir Ralph Beauple in 1355, so they might well have known each other on an earlier campaign. 

Knowstone is in north Devon.
 

In 1350 Nigel was sent on a diplomatic mission to the Low Countries. He was commissioned with others to treat with [King Edward's wife] Queen Philippa's sister, the Empress Margaret, concerning payments due to the king for the government of the Low Countries in Zealand, Holland and Friesland [citation omitted]. This was a responsible mission. He is authorised to negotiate with the Empress Margaret and her advisors about financial matters and tasked with getting the Empress to hand over monies owed to Edward III. 

Nigel entered the household of Edward, Prince of Wales, about 1350, and by1355 had become his chamberlain, one of the three highest household offices. 

Edward, Prince of Wales, in his Garter robes


The chamberlain was the closest personal servant to the prince. The post carried an immense amount of influence and responsibility and it was usually held by men who were close personal friends. The chamberlain had responsibility for the treasure and the jewels and for controlling both written and personal access to the prince. Petitions brought to the prince would normally have been endorsed by the chamberlain. He attended personally on the prince and vetted those who were either allowed to see the prince or turned away. It is fairly safe to assume that the prince trusted Nigel and that he liked him enough to have him with him during the most part of every day. He must also have trusted his judgement. He was part of the prince’s permanent staff. As chamberlain he would have been busy with all the coming and going and messengers between the prince’s commanders, the council in London and the king on campaign in Scotland. The pope also sent nuncios to the prince and his commanders to try to stop the campaign and the war. Nigel must have had a team of knights and squires he could use as messengers between all these people. 

 Nigel was about to accompany Edward, Prince of Wales, later called the Black Prince, perhaps because of his brutality to the French citizenry, on campaign in France. He was a member of the prince's war council while in England and again after landing in France in September 1355. In October the prince began a chevauchée into Aquitaine, during which he pillaged Avignonet and Castelnaudary, sacked Carcassonne, and plundered Narbonne. After 58 days, they headed for winter quarters.

Nigel spent the winter in Bordeaux with the prince. As his chamberlain and close friend, he was never given a military command because his purpose was to counsel the prince and to physically protect him, especially in battle. 

While in France, the prince allegedly lost his signet ring and used Nigel's to stamp wax seals on documents. In 1866 the prince's signet ring was discovered at Montpensier in the Auverne, which he had pillaged in 1356. It now rests in the Louvre. The ring is gold, originally enameled, set with a carved ruby.
Detail of carved ruby on the Black Prince's signet ring.

The next year, 1356, on another chevauchée, the prince ravaged the Auverne, Limousin, and Berry, but failed to take Bourges. He offered terms of peace to King Jean II of France, who had outflanked him near Poitiers, but refused to surrender himself as the price of their acceptance. This led to the Battle of Poitiers, in which the prince's  army routed the French and took King Jean prisoner. (After some ransom was paid and lands granted to Edward III, Jean was released in 1360 to raise more ransom, and his son Louis exchanged for him at Calais; learning his son had escaped Calais, King Jean voluntarily returned to captivity and died in England in 1364).

King Jean II of France, painted on board c. 1350 during his lifetime.
 

On the eve of the battle of Poitiers, Sir Nigel, two other knights, and two yeomen were chosen as the prince's personal bodyguard, likely because they were the best fighters to defend the heir to the throne. Because they were unable to capture their own prisoners for ransom, the prince doubtlessly handsomely rewarded Sir Nigel and the others. The Battle of Poitiers is still considered a great English victory HERE

Battle of Poitiers by Eugene Delacroix in 19th century


Nigel was sent at the end of October 1356 along with Sir Roger Cotesford to take a personal message from the prince to the king [citation omitted] and to give a full, personal report to the king as a trusted member of the prince’s household who was there with the prince and in the war council. Nigel also took a letter to the Mayor, Aldermen and people of London from the prince. The letter was copied into the letter books of the City and so its contents have survived.[citation omitted] The letter to the Mayor of London says that if he wants to know more he should ask Sir Nigel Loring who is described as our very dear and beloved knight. The mayor and aldermen were asked to give Nigel their trust in his word as he was speaking from his own knowledge. Nigel would also have been able to tell the king what the prince’s thoughts were for the next stage of the campaign. Instructions and communication of the views of the king and his council was equally important and Nigel and Cotesford would have brought these back with them when they returned to Bordeaux. Since Nigel was involved with the peace negotiation and had instructions from the king it is likely he returned as soon as a ship could take him, probably before Christmas.

The record of the award made to Nigel after the battle of Poitiers tells us that he was there and that he was one of the men in the prince’s personal bodyguard that day. ‘Our dear and well loved chamberlain Neel Loheryn in Gascony and in particular the battle of Poitiers where he was assigned to our body is granted £403 6s 8d’.[citation omitted] This was worth £238,000 in 2012.[citation omitted] 

The Prince of Wales returned to England with his armies, booty, and King Jean, to great celebration.  

It was probably about this time that the prince gave him the manor of Trematon in Cornwall for his lifetime. On Nigel’s death it reverted to the Duchy of Cornwall. . . Nigel was awarded a pension of £83 6s 8d per year. No previous expedition had brought back so many rich prisoners or so much wealth. 

In about 1359 Nigel rented a house in London so his wife Margaret and their two daughters could come to court. That same year the prince gave Nigel lands in Wales.

In 1359 King Edward again declared war on France, and Nigel accompanied the prince there in October. For seven months the King's armies pillaged, burned and foraged, but King Jean's son, the dauphin, refused to meet in battle. On May 10, 1360, Nigel was a witness to the Treaty of Brétigny, in which King Edward renounced his claim to the French throne in return for Aquitaine, about one-third of France, in full sovereignty, and the English returned home. Between November 1360 and October 1361, Nigel was one of the commissioners in the transference of towns, castles and lands in Aquitaine from the French to the English, and also to cause issues, rents, revenues and other emoluments thereof arising to be levied to the king's use, to take in his name oaths of fealty of nobles and others, to depute and establish justices, provosts, bailiffs and other ministers and officers. It called for being a good administrator and keeping meticulous records. Nigel was about 40 years old. He was still chamberlain to the Prince of Wales, and so must have spent more time in London than in Aquitaine, and managed his clerks and lawyers from there.

In 1363, the Prince of Wales and Aquitaine moved his court to Aquitaine. Nigel and his wife Margaret were a part of the court at Bordeaux until 1367. Those must have been heady days. In August 1363 the Prince petitioned Pope Urban V for a portable altar for his steward and for Nigel, his chamberlain, because they traveled so often about Aquitaine and could then hear mass privately.

‘Edward, prince of Aquitaine and Wales: On behalf of the steward of his household, Thomas de Felton, knight, and Joan his wife, for a portable altar. The same: For the like on behalf of his chamberlain, Nigel Loring, knight, and Margaret his wife. Granted for six years’


In 1362 Pedro, king of Castile had signed an Anglo Castilian alliance. . . The French were supporting Pedro’s brother Enrique who was his rival for the throne of Castile. The alliance only allowed the English to fight the French within Castile. In 1365 the French sent the ‘free companies’ that were causing havoc in France to fight the Moors in southern Spain. In fact the real motive for sending them to Spain was to help Enrique in Castile against his brother Pedro. King Pedro invoked the Anglo Castilian treaty in the autumn of 1365. It was too late and Enrique defeated his brother and was crowned king of Castile in the spring of 1366. King Pedro was in exile in Portugal by early June 1366. At the end of June he returned to Galicia, which was still holding out against Enrique and it was here that Nigel was sent as one of the prince’s ambassadors to discuss what King Pedro required. The prince then sent Nigel and three other knights to England to discuss the Spanish campaign with King Edward [citation omitted]. Nigel was able to spend about 6 months in England. . . .

 
He was only about 46 years of age but he had made a great deal of money which he had invested in new property. He started to enhance his manors by building parks at some of them. Permission to build a park was a reward from the king. It meant that Nigel was given permission to hunt on his own land. Technically he was given the right of ‘free warren’ which meant he had the right to keep a pack of hounds and hunt game (not deer or boar). This was a right normally reserved to the king and nobility. . .  He was given the right to build hunting parks at Chalgrave, Beaworthy and Porlock.

19th century depiction of the Black Prince crossing the Pyrenees with his army in February 1367
 

In February 1367, the prince, Nigel, and the prince's armies crossed the Pyrenees in snow and ice to help King Pedro regain the throne of Castile from his half-brother, Enrique. It's a complicated story of treachery and intrigue, resulting in the victorious Battle of Nájera in April. HERE  Afterward, the prince wanted payment for his armies from Dom Pedro, who went to Seville to raise money, but failed to return. Nigel was sent with others to discover why. By late summer the prince's army was suffering from hunger, malaria and dysentery, including the prince, who took his depleted army back over the Pyrenees and reached Bayonne in September. 

Relations with the French were worsening and by early 1369 war was imminent. Nigel was still being named as chamberlain to the Prince and was one of his councillors named on 17th October 1369 when the City of Poitiers was granted rights of high justice. The prince had been ill with dysentery ever since returning from Spain and much of the routine administration work must have been devolved to his councillors. French and English raids began again. The prince oversaw the long siege of Limoges and when the city fell he ordered the execution of 3,000 inhabitants including women and children. Then he set fire to the city. . . [I]n 1369 Nigel served with Sir Robert Knolles in his expedition into the Agenois at the siege of Domme and the following year with John Hastings second earl of Pembroke in Poitou. . . The Prince of Wales was back in England by April 1372. Nigel returned with him.  

Siege of Limoge

Nigel had served ten years with the prince in Aquitaine. At the time of his knighthood the king had awarded him £20 per year to maintain his estate as a knight. In 1371 he was forced to remind the king he had not been paid for the previous ten years. King Edward ordered payment, worth £255,700 at 2013 purchasing power, or about $330,807. Patience was the hallmark of those serving the royal household. Nigel continued to acquire lands and manors - what else would a successful knight do with war booty? His two daughters became wealthy heiresses.

Likly where Nigel's daughter Margaret, our ancestress, married. All Saints Church, close to Chalgrave Manor, consecrated in 1219. It lost its tower in a storm.
 

In about 1372, upon his return to England, Nigel's daughter, our ancestress Margaret (c1355-1424), married their Bedfordshire neighbor, Thomas Pever/Pevre (c1346-1429), who had inherited his father's estate in 1361. They became our 18th great-grandparents. Pever's estate, Toddington, was a half-mile from Chalgrave, which Margaret inherited on her father's death. She brought land in Devon and Bedfordshire as a marriage jointure. Although it must have been an arranged marriage, she no doubt knew Thomas Pever and hopefully entered the marriage with contentment. He was eleven years older, but he outlived her.

Edward the Black Prince's tomb in Canterbury Cathedral

The Prince of Wales wasted away with dysentery until his death in June 1376. Sir Nigel Loring likely served him until his end. Nigel is not mentioned on any court roll after the prince's death, and so must have retired to his estates, but the prince, knowing his end was near, had made certain that lands and rents he'd given Nigel in 1358 would be paid after his death. In 1378 the following was enrolled in the Close Rolls.

 ‘To the justice and chamberlain of North Wales, and all sheriffs, escheators and other the king's ministers there for the time being. Order to suffer Nigel de Lohereyn the king's knight to hold and enjoy the boroughs of Nevyn and Purthely, the fee farms and manors thereof, the services of all tenants, wards, marriages etc. within boroughs and without, the pastures, fisheries, woods, mills, multures etc. thereto pertaining and 4l [£4] of yearly rent due for repairs of the said manors, according to letters patent of E. prince of Wales, dated 21 July in the fifteenth year of his principality, [1358]granting the premises to the said Nigel and to the heirs of his body as fully as the prince himself had the same. By p.s. [456.]’[citation omitted]

Sir Nigel Loring lived in retirement on his estates for ten years prior to his death. 


Nigel left a will dated 12 March 1385 in which he asked to be buried in the conventual church of the Order of Saint Augustine at Dunstaple in the diocese of Lincoln, near his wife [not named], who was buried there. His mansion and shops, etc., in the parish of Saint Andrew near Baynards Castle [in London] were to be sold for pious and charitable uses [citation omitted]. The will was proved 18th October 1386. This tells us that Margaret had died before him and was buried at Dunstable so her death had taken place in the ten years since their return from Aquitaine. Presumably by March 1385 he was either ill or beginning to feel weak. However, he lived on for another year and died on 18th March 1386. He was buried at Dunstable Priory on 25th March 1386. He was 66 years old. 

Dunstable Priory where Sir Nigel was buried
 
Believed to be a memorial effigy of Sir Nigel Loring in All Saints Church in Chalgrave, Bedfordshire

The will has a long list of bequests to orders of friars, nunneries and churches in the 13 parishes where he held lands. The only personal goods mentioned are a gold circlet valued at £40 and 2,367 great marguerite pearls specially prized possessions which were to be shared between his two daughters. His real estate had already been settled on his trustees for division between his two daughters. His daughter Margaret received the manor of Chalgrave but the manor house, the outhouses and barns and the stock pens and fish ponds were divided between the two sisters.

No trace of Chalgrave Manor exists. The land it stood was plowed after World War II and now is covered by a golf course. 

Loring arms surrounded by the Order of the Knights of the Garter

P.S. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle wrote two historical novels that feature Sir Nigel Loring. Although Doyle was proud of these best-sellers, they are not historically accurate about Loring himself, but perhaps are of the times. Although I downloaded for free The White Company and Sir Nigel from Amazon, I found them difficult to get into.